WFTU member organisation takes part in celebration of Vladimir Lenin’s birthday

The Trade union of labor migrant workers in Russia – the WFTU member, took part in event in honour and memory of Vladimir Lenin. The event took place on Lenin’s birthday – April,22 in front of Lenin Mausoleum in the Red Square in Moscow.The WFTU banner was highly appreciated by all comrades who gathered to demonstrate that ideas of the leader of the international working class Lenin are alive and class struggle is the only way to destroy capitalist barbarity. Internationalism and class solidarity is effective weapon of the Russian and international working class.

The Trump 2020 War Budget Creates a New Opportunity for the US Antiwar Movement

 
By the US Peace Council, March 31, 2019

 
President Donald Trump has unwittingly handed the U.S. peace movement an opportunity to elevate the discussion of the runaway Pentagon military budget, an issue that has been almost entirely absent from US politics. For 2020, Trump openly proposes another gigantic increase in the Pentagon budget by direct cuts in spending on all social needs. By mobilizing local support for public hearings, especially within City Halls around the country, the peace movement can expose the destruction of our communities resulting from U.S. war policies and engage allies from many sectors to join us in demanding that we reverse course, cut military spending and transfer funds to spending on human needs. The conclusion of this statement is a set of recommendations, based on our own experience for generating that public discussion.
______
 
THE UNPRECEDENTED SOCIAL DAMAGE OF THIS BUDGET 
 
On March 12, 2019 President Trump released his proposed Federal budget for 2020. It proposed Pentagon spending of $750 billion— a $34 billion increase over last year’s request.
According to Lindsay Koshgarian of the National Priorities Project:
Every single department in this budget gets a cut except for the Department of Defense, Veterans Affairs Department, Homeland Security, and a little teeny tiny plus for the Department of Commerce…. They have about $2.7 trillion dollars in cuts to social programs …. It’s an enormous cut. It’s about 9 percent across the board to everything that’s not the military and Homeland Security. And the biggest and hardest hit are things like Medicaid, Medicare, that President Trump, when he ran for office, said he wasn’t going to touch. So there’s a big step back on his word in terms of those programs, and that may actually hurt him when his base comes to realize that’s what’s going on. [1]
 
Although Republicans supported Trump’s budget proposal, there were outcries from liberals and some Democrats. They were louder this year because the spending priorities were more barbaric this year. The Trump budget was pronounced “dead on arrival,” in the now Democrat-controlled House of Representatives, a doubtful claim, given the pattern of Congressional Democratic quiet surrender to Trump budget priorities especially its military component. While decrying cuts to social spending, Democrats failed to criticize the continued bloating of the Pentagon.
 
Journalist Matt Taibbi has written about the chicanery and deception in this budget. In the past two budgets, both te Republicans and the Democrats have handed the Pentagon a raise. Both major parties are complicit:
 
“The military is once again poised to receive a huge budgetary bump from President Trump, and the Democrats don’t seem interested in doing much 
about it. Last week, reports emerged that Trump, while touting overall spending cuts “higher than any administration in history,” was planning to ask for a $750 billion defense budget...This will put an end to years of what’s known as budget “parity,” or the idea that defense and non-defense funding should rise and fall together.
 
Last year, the Department of Defense failed to pass its first-ever audit. For this and other reasons, one would think that this would be a good time for Democrats to band together and prevent a raise in military spending, or even fight for cuts until the Pentagon can get its books in order. That doesn’t seem to be in the works.
 
According to a Capital Hill source, the Democrats are targeting a counter-offer above the $716 billion budget Trump asked for in 2018. In other words, the Democrats want to lower Trump’s number, but still give the Pentagon a raise.
 
“Even the opening number is going to be really high,” says the source.
Trump’s budget request represents a 5-percent increase overall. Budget analysts have said they expect the final number to be between last year’s $716 billion figure and $733 billion, the likely final number also quoted in Rolling Stone. A $733 billion defense budget number would represent a 2.4-percent increase, or about half of what Trump wants
 
Should the Democrats approve a $733 billion budget — remember, Trump’s $716 billion budget passed 85-10 in the Senate last year — it would break a record for the second consecutive year.
 
This [budget chicanery this year]  is … a trick allowing Trump, and likely Congress, to increase defense spending while cutting everything else, despite laws in place designed to prevent exactly this situation.
 
A $750-billion budget would roughly equal the total spent by the next 15 highest-spending countries, a list that includes England, France, Germany, Italy and Japan — none of which appears to pose much of a threat. Our military spending more than doubles that of our two most serious competitors, China ($224 billion) and Russia ($44 billion).
 
The Trump budget request includes $31 billion to “modernize” our nuclear triad, plus funding for an additional Virginia-class submarine and 78 F-35 jets from Lockheed-Martin at a cost of $11.2 billion. There is also a request for $7 billion in “emergency” funding for building whatever it is they’re calling Trump’s hare-brained wall plan these days.
 
The wall funding is likely to spur enough controversy that it will take a long time for the two sides to agree on final numbers. But expect the Democrats to agree up-front to a large military increase, perhaps in conjunction with a deal for higher base non-defense spending levels in the name of “parity.” [2]
 
 
FROM GUNS AND BUTTER TO MORE GUNS, AND TAKE AWAY THE  BUTTER 
 
Why is this year different? Why is the contradiction between Pentagon spending and the rest of the budget now sharper than ever?  What does that mean for a peace strategy?
 
There has always been a contradiction between “guns and butter,” so to speak. Since the 1950s bloated Pentagon spending has deprived the US people of vital spending on genuine social needs.
 
What is new and little noted --- even in the US antiwar movement --- is that this 2020 budget marks a huge departure. The expansion of military spending in 2020 has been obtained by shrinking civilian, social and non-military spending. As well, these cuts hurt key Trump constituencies he promised to protect in 2016. In the 2020 budget for the first time the increase in military spending is being paid for by savage cuts in non-military spending. That is new. It has important political implications.

THE FIGHT AGAINST THE PENTAGON BUDGET

In its most cautious form, protests against Pentagon spending oppose “waste, fraud and abuse.” Protest can be against “misplaced priorities.” Pentagon spending can be opposed for moral, religious and pacifist reasons.
 
But the motive that can bring millions of people into sustained struggle against bloated Pentagon spending is that it represents an attack on one’s life and livelihood, an obvious attack on one’s direct material interests. 
 
That -- we argue -- is now clearly the case, for the first time. Pentagon spending now openly threatens the direct material interests of millions of Americans. Also, there is a new quality and force to the environmental argument against Pentagon spending. The Pentagon is the greatest polluter in the world, and progressive opinion is far more attuned to the existential threat to humanity posed by environmental destruction. [4]
 
The US antiwar movement has experience in trying to utilize this contradiction between guns and butter, with mixed results. For example, after 1975, in the post-Vietnam War era, the Coalition for New Foreign and Military Policy proposed the Transfer Amendment, an amendment to the federal budget which would have transferred billions from military to civilian spending.
 
More recently, in the summer of 2017 the US Conference of Mayors, 253 mayors in all, fearing the impact on city services of a likely Trump budget skewed lopsidedly in favor of military spending, unanimously passed a resolution calling on city councils across the nation to hold hearings on the impact of the military budget on city service provision.
 
The idea was to engage local government, the level of government most likely to suffer cutbacks in Federal aid as resources are drained away to pay for wasteful war spending. The goal was to bring to bear local government pressure on federal lawmakers, the only ones who can vote on the federal budget, to reconsider their habit of unthinkingly and automatically supporting the gargantuan war budget, and to demand for the sake of the cities and their most vulnerable populations, a more rational balance between guns and butter.
 

US PEACE COUNCIL EXPERIENCE IN THE LAST THREE YEARS

Based on our own local experience in New Haven, New York and New Jersey, working to give reality to the Mayors’ Resolution of July 2017, we suggest these ideas for a stepped-up and expanded campaign against Pentagon spending in 2019 and beyond.
 
1. Resolutions passed at City Council level should clearly indicate that there will be a political price to pay if members of Congress do not oppose runaway military budgets. Congress will be held publicly accountable. Congressional support for the runaway military budget will be publicly exposed.  Testimony should focus both on the cuts and on the needs that will go unmet. Invite the media to hearings. Quickly share expert testimony with the mass media to maximize political pressure on federal lawmakers to resist the Pentagon and right-wing pressure.
 
2. Continue to focus on local government -- Mayors and City Council members -- including appointed city agency heads who best know their own budget. They will be in the direct line of fire from the impending draconian budget cuts. Agency heads can discuss concretely what each city agency needs to carry out its goals and what the agency could accomplish if funds were available to it that now go to the military.
 
3. Hearings should always invite testimony from nonprofits on how the needs of their constituents go unmet, parents and teachers to testify on how the needs of children go unmet, and other nongovernmental agencies. Invite the groups most likely to suffer, the most vulnerable, the poor, communities of color, the elderly, the sick, unorganized working people, and so forth. Their testimony should likewise be made public to the mass media as speedily as possible.
 
4. As the Mayors’ 2017 Resolution directed, there should be a mandatory, institutionalized public educational component to the campaign. This is a long-term campaign. Each city should include in its report on its public hearings, a report on how much of its residents’ federal taxes go toward paying for the military budget. Urge each city government to pass a law mandating the Mayor annually request reports from federal legislators and the US government on how they are moving significant funds away from the military budget to human needs. Each city should send a copy of the
resolution passed to its federal legislators with a demand that they respond with their plans to reduce the military budget in favor of the human needs budget.
 
5. The peace movement should focus its search for allies on grassroots and independent forces, and not rely on party labels. Those who receive funding from the military-industrial complex, including corporate Democrats, will seldom be friends of this campaign.
 
6. Seek allies in the trade unions. The key argument is that for the same amount of funding there are fewer jobs in making weapons and war than on manufacturing for human needs [5]. Seek support from public sector unions and unions in the service sector that will be negatively impacted by the direction of Trump’s budget. Federal legislators claim they are creating jobs with military spending. The reality is that they are creating fewer jobs than if the same amount of funding went to spending on human needs. Thus, they are actually killing jobs. The falsehood of creating jobs with military funding is best answered by voices from within the unions. Some voices can be found even now, especially in the public sector.
 
Hundreds of thousands of US workers toil in the arms industries. Peace campaigners must show utmost sensitivity to their plight. Any proposal to slash Pentagon spending must also include guarantees for jobs for them at equivalent pay in other industries. It can be done if there is the political will. There exists a vast literature on economic conversion and Just Transition.
 
CONCLUSION 
To take advantage of this new opening we offer these reflections on lessons leaned by US Peace Council in New Haven, New York and elsewhere. The outrageousness of the Trump war budget has created a new political opening for the peace movement and its allies. The whole peace movement ought to respond to the opening by stepping up the struggle against the Pentagon budget.
 

Endnotes 
[1] Lindsay Koshgarian Interview with Mark Steiner of The Real News "Trump's Militarized Budget Slashes Medicare, Medicaid, and Clean Energy" March 14, 2019.
[2] Matt Taibbi, "Trump Wants More War Money Than Last Year and Democrats Don't Seem to Mind." Rolling Stone  March 19, 2019.
[3] The "Million Parts per Trillion Tour" Featuring America's Most Contaminated Military Bases By Pat Elder, Military Poisons.org.
[4] https://www.peri.umass.edu/publication/item/995-job-opportunity-cost-of-war
 
 
_____________________________________________________________
Appendix #1
 
City of New Haven Peace Commission
Resolution Calling for Hearing on Funding Human Services in New Haven
 
WHEREAS, by vote of the Board of Alders the New Haven ballot in November 2012
contained the nonbinding referendum, “Shall Congress reduce military spending;
transfer funds to convert to civilian production; create jobs to rebuild our
infrastructure; meet pressing human needs?”
 
WHEREAS, 23,398 citizens voted for this resolution and only 4,152 voted against it, thus
it passed overwhelmingly by nearly six to one;
 
WHEREAS each year the Pentagon and other Federal Departments engaged in war and
preparations for war are provided 55% of the Federal Discretionary Budget, that is
money raised by our taxes and borrowing, leaving all other needs of the people –
education, veterans benefits, housing and community, healthcare, social security and
unemployment and labor, energy and environment, international affairs, science,
transportation, food and agriculture – to divide up among them the remaining 45%;
 
WHEREAS in 2013 the State of Connecticut passed Public Act 13-19, which called for
establishing a Commission to investigate how CT could create jobs manufacturing
civilian, green products as alternatives to producing weapons for war;
 
WHEREAS the National Priorities Project, a nonprofit organization based in
Northampton, Massachusetts, annually analyzes and publishes information and charts
detailing how the large US military budget and ongoing wars take funds important for
human needs required by every city, congressional district and state, and if redirected
what products and services these funds might provide;
 
WHEREAS one of the Board of Alders’ main priorities is developing livable wage jobs
for New Haven residents, which would include service sector jobs;
 
WHEREAS the Board of Alders has in past years held public hearings with
presentations by the National Priorities Project;
 
And WHEREAS the city of New Haven has limited resources both to fulfill the human
service needs of the city and to generate good jobs;
 
Therefore, the City of New Haven Peace Commission urges the Human Services
Committee of the Board of Alders to
1) call one or more public hearings in the winter/spring of 2016 to reveal what the
extent of the city’s public and human services needs are, what the gaps are
between the city’s needs and all funds provided by taxes, grants and debt, and
how those gaps could be met by reducing the annual national military budget;
2) invite representatives of the National Priorities Project and any other
organization that weighs spending on military versus human needs to make
presentations; and
3) invite directors of relevant city departments – including but not limited to
Community Services; Livable City Initiative; Public Works; Engineering;
Transportation, Traffic and Parking; Parks & Recreation; Arts, Culture &
Tourism; Education – to speak to their departments’ unfulfilled needs.
 
And WHEREAS: Such a public hearing, duly noticed, was held by the Human Services
Committee of the Board of Alders on January 26, 2017, where an informative discussion
was achieved.
 
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the New Haven Board of Alders shall send
a letter with a copy of this resolution to all of the city’s federal legislators, urging them to
cut the military budget and use the savings to fund human services, infrastructure and
other local needs.
_______________________________________________________________________
Appendix #2
New York City Council
Res. No. 747
 
Resolution calling on the federal government and its legislators to move significant funds away from the military budget to fund human needs and services.  Introduced Feb. 2019
 
By Council Member Ydanis Rodriguez  
 
Whereas, spending on defense already makes up more than half of the federal discretionary budget and President Trump is seeking to increase this to 65 percent by 2023; and,
Whereas, this increase would be offset by cuts to social services, and New York City would lose at least $850 million under this budget shakeup; and, 
Whereas, like other local governments, New York City’s ability to fund essential social services relies in part on federal grants; and,
Whereas, the City’s Department of Housing and Preservation, for example, is the largest municipal housing agency in the nation and currently 83 percent of its budget comes from federal funds; and,  
Whereas, according to the New York City Comptroller, cuts to federal programs would directly impact the lives of New Yorkers because it would eliminate the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance program, which 770,000 New Yorkers rely on to keep their homes warm in the winter; and, 
Whereas, additional programs that would be cut include the Community Services Block Grant, which funds rental assistance, summer youth employment and adult literacy programs, and the Social Services Block Grant, which funds a broad range of programs, from providing meals and services to the elderly, to helping victims of domestic violence find safe shelter; and,
Whereas, the United States consistently outspends other countries on military and defense; and,
Whereas, in 2017 the country spent over $600 billion on the military, more than Japan, the United Kingdom, France, India, Saudi Arabia, Russia and China combined; and, 
Whereas, polling has shown that constituents do not want increases in defense budgets, especially at the cost of social services; and,
Whereas, a poll by the University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation recently revealed that while President Trump wants to increase military spending by more than $52 million, those polled said they wanted to see the defense budget cut by $41 million; and,
Whereas, according to data from the National Priorities Project, taxpayers in New York City contributed more than $25 billion to the Department of Defense (‘DOD’) in 2017, but a small decrease in the military budget could provide a range of essential services for New Yorkers; and,
Whereas, reducing the DOD contribution by ten percent could fund healthcare for approximately 850,000 children from low-income families, medical care for nearly 200,000 veterans, stimulus to create more than 46,000 infrastructure jobs and 25,000 additional elementary school teachers jobs; and,
Whereas, in June 2017, the United States Conference of Mayors, including New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, unanimously passed a resolution calling upon all cities to hold public hearings on the ways that the federal defense budget hampers local spending on essential social services; and,
, residents of New York City have a right to know and publicly comment on how their Whereas tax dollars are spent and which services they want funded and prioritized;
Whereas, local governments are the main victims of lopsided federal priorities embodied in a federal budget skewed to Pentagon spending; and, 
Whereas, these municipalities could be much more fair and stronger if the federal government spent less on the military and instead utilized the money to improve transportation, education, housing, healthcare, environmental protection, and public goods and services; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, that the federal government and its legislators move significant funds away from the military budget to fund human needs and services. 
 
LMS
LS #6495
2/8/19
___________________________________________________________________________
Appendix #3  -- Greater New Haven Peace Council Flyer 
 
LOOK OUT!!
 
Trump’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Discretionary Budget request tops 1.3 TRILLION! 
 
The military budget is increasing from $727 billion (61% of discretionary spending) to over $750 billion! Make no mistake about it folks, this is a budget for the military industrial complex, corporate CEO’s, Wall Street, and for the billionaire class of robber barons.
 
Where will the money come from? Buckle your seat belts, pilgrims. Here it is. Read it and weep.
 
Over the next 10 years, Trump’s budget would cut:

• $1.5 trillion from Medicaid
• $845 billion from Medicare
• $25 billion from Social Security
• $207 billion from college education
• $220 billion from food stamps

 

This is a budget that promises “a more lethal force,” adding more victims to the hundreds of thousands – military and civilians – killed as a result of U.S. wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. It is also a more lethal budget with big cuts to food stamps, healthcare, legal protection for the poor, low income housing, employment training, environmental protection, parks, renewable energy, and more.
Your tax dollars will fund these obscene increases:
 
WEAPONS

• $24 billion more for nuclear weapons, which 122 nations are working to outlaw
• $69 billion more for endless war & more drone strikes that have killed over 5,000 civilians in Iraq & Syria since Oct. 2014
• $10 billion for a missile “defense” system: false insecurity and more militarism
• $75 billion for aircraft, missiles, tanks and giant contractors like Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and Boeing
• A lot more for the Pentagon, which has never passed an audit and cannot account for billions of dollars of your money

 
WALLS

• $1.6 BILLION – U.S dollars not Mexican pesos – for 65 miles of border wall
• $3.5 billion for more armed border agents, ICE officers and 52,000 detention beds
• $15 billion cut to the State Dept. says to the world “military force not diplomacy”
• An endless drumbeat of tweets and reporting that criminalizes immigrant communities in the nation of immigrants

 
WHOPPING DEFICITS

• $7 trillion added to the deficit over 10 years
• U.S. public debt spikes with every war and military build-up since the Civil War
• Children will be paying off debt for today’s endless wars – and

$1 trillion/year medical and disability costs for thousands of wounded veterans
 
Sources: National Priorities Project (nationalpriorities.org)
               International Coalition to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (icanw.org)
               Public Debt History at Wikipedia (Wikipedia.org)
               Warren Gunnels, staff director for Senator Bernie Sanders
 
As the World War II combat veteran, esteemed educator, and dedicated anti-war activist, Howard Zinn, said: “If Patriotism means supporting your government’s policies without question, then we are on our way to a Totalitarian State!”
 
Please Call: Your Congress persons at 202.224.3121 today! 
 
Don’t whine. Get off your duffs and do something about it! Silence is not an option.

Keith Ellison: Time to address wage theft is now

https://advocate.stpaulunions.org/2019/04/25/keith-ellison-time-to-address-wage-theft-is-now/

Keith Ellison, Minnesota Attorney General

Frankly, I was shocked.

Here I was, listening to a man through an interpreter describe how the paycheck that he worked so hard for at fairly low wages was delivered to him in a debit card. He didn’t get a regular paycheck or a check stub of any kind: he was told that this debit card represented his pay and that the pay had been deposited for him.

It was hard for him to figure out how much he had actually gotten paid. When he did, he found that he had lost as many as three days’ wages even though he had worked hard every single day.

He’s not alone. Kevin’s restaurant didn’t pay him for the time he spent setting up and cleaning his work station as a cook. Emilio was told that his Sunday shift at a convenience store was “volunteer time.” Marfa’s employer withheld her wages and her passport; when she got her passport back, she was tricked into signing a document that said she had been paid when she hadn’t been.

Gonzalo, a construction worker, has had at least $1,000 a year stolen in wages – for each of the last eight years. Now, he just budgets for it.

These folks are all victims of wage theft. Wage theft takes many forms: having hours shaved off your paycheck; being forced to work off the clock; not getting paid for overtime; being paid at a lower rate than promised, sometimes below minimum wage; being paid in cash or other forms, with no Social Security, unemployment, or worker’s comp withheld; being misclassified as an independent contractor; and more.

I was shocked for two reasons. First, I honestly didn’t know wage theft happens. As much solidarity as I felt with hard-working people, I had never spent a day working hard for which I didn’t get the pay I was promised.

I was also shocked at the frequency with which wage theft happens. Reputable studies from several years ago estimate that two-thirds of all low-wage workers in the country have experienced at least one form of wage theft. The amount of wages stolen each year in Minnesota may be in the hundreds of millions of dollars: nationally, the Economic Policy Institute has estimated that $50 billion a year is stolen in wage theft. That’s more than three times the value of all the goods stolen through robbery, burglary, larceny and auto theft combined.

Those estimates are 5-10 years old now. In an economy that’s gotten more and more predatory, it’s surely only gotten worse.

One reason people don’t know wage theft happens is because employers often retaliate or threaten to retaliate against people who report it. Another reason is that wage theft commonly happens in the shadows, to the most vulnerable among us, especially immigrants, people of color, and young people. African American workers are three times more likely to have had their wages stolen than white workers, and Latina/o workers are four times more likely. The predators who steal from these folks do so because they figure they’re the least likely to report it.

Too often, wage theft is connected to criminal abuse. According to human-rights advocates, every case of human trafficking also involves wage theft. If you find people being trafficked, you’ll find people whose wages are being stolen. That’s happening right here: in Hennepin County, a contractor has been charged with human trafficking, insurance fraud, and undocumented wage theft. The charges claim that “he knew the men that he had employed were undocumented workers and used that knowledge as leverage to force them to work long hours for less than market pay and without adequate safety protection,” and that “when workers were injured, he told his employees that they would lose their jobs and be deported if they sought medical attention.”

If you do get paid every penny you’ve earned – and I hope you do – wage theft still affects you. We’re all paying higher payroll taxes to cover this fraud. Legitimate companies who play by the rules and the people who work for them lose business because they can’t compete against companies that steal money from their workers and the government. Every dollar these thieves don’t pay in taxes is a dollar that isn’t going to pay a teacher or a nurse or a laborer building a road that benefits of all of us. And the money being stolen from workers is money that’s not going back into the local economy.

In short, if American workers are a ship trying to sail forward in ever rougher seas, wage theft is a dragging anchor holding them back.

Fortunately, we can do more to help. I strongly support a bill at the Legislature – HF 6, authored by Rep. Tim Mahoney, a union pipefitter, and SF 1933, authored by Sen. Bobby Joe Champion – that will give us more tools and resources to charge people with the crime of wage theft and prosecute it more aggressively. It also creates protections for workers who come forward, and imposes higher penalties on unscrupulous employers. And because wage theft is often a sign of other abuse, this bill will also make it easier to uncover and prosecute criminal behavior like denial of medical treatment, fraud and human trafficking. I encourage you to contact your legislators and ask them to support it.

In addition, I’m starting a new unit in the Attorney General’s Office that will focus exclusively on investigating and prosecuting wage theft and other abuse of workers. If HF 6 passes, it will give us many more tools to protect workers, recover wages and hold offenders accountable.

The principle that you should get paid for every hour you worked and every penny you earned is common sense. No one should be against that. But as the Minnesota Legislature heads into the final stretch, one of the biggest problems we face in fighting wage theft is that too many people still don’t believe it actually happens.

Our job is to speak the truth about wage theft and how it hurts all of us. That’s what I’m doing. I’m asking you to join me.

– Keith Ellison has been serving as Minnesota’s Attorney General since January 7, 2019. As the People’s Lawyer, his job is to help Minnesotans afford their lives and live with dignity and respect. Before becoming Attorney General, he represented Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives for 12 years.

WFTU solidarity message with the people of Sri Lanka

The World Federation of Trade Unions, on behalf of its 97 million members in 130 countries of the 5 continents, expresses its sincere condolences to the families of the victims in Sri Lanka. We join our sadness and sorrow with the working class and people of Sri Lanka who faced this terrorist attack resulting in the unjust death of hundreds of innocent people.

The international class-oriented trade union movement condemns this terrorist act, which consequences will be against the people and the workers, regardless of the physical and moral perpetrators. There is no a doubt that the government, bourgeoisie and imperialists will exploit this fact to hit the struggles of the workers, the democratic and trade union rights, to restrict popular freedoms and to strengthen state violence and state authoritarianism.

Dear colleagues,
We express our sympathy and our sorrow for what happened.
We and our affiliated trade unions will stand by you.

The Secretariat