The US War Machine Will Rage On
Until We Rise Up to Stop It!
Join the People’s Mobilization to Stop the US War Machine

The US War Machine must be stopped, and only we can stop it. That’s why we are organizing the People’s Mobilization to Stop the US War Machine, which is organizing and supporting a series of actions in New York City from September 20 to 23 while the United Nations General Assembly meets.

At a time when all of the world leaders gather, we will say we’ve had enough of the US War Machine.

Schedule of Events:

Plan to come to New York City for a full weekend of events. Facebook event page is here

Friday, September 20 - People's Climate Strike. Starts at Union Square at noon. We'll bring messages connecting militarism and the climate crisis. For more info: https://strikewithus.org/nyc/

Saturday, September 21 - Puerto Rico Independence March starting at 11:00 am at 59th St. Columbus Circle and marching to Dag Hammarskjold Plaza at the UN. It's time to decolonize Puerto Rico.  Click here for rally flyer
Sunday, September 22 - People's Mobilization to Stop the US War Machine and Save the Planet, Herald Square, 2 pm.

Monday, September 23 - Forum: "A Path to International Peace: Realizing the Vision of the United Nations Charter." Location: Community Church of New York 40 East 35th St., New York City, 10016. Time:  6:30 pm. You must register in advance. Register at http://bit.ly/RSVPapathtopeace.  At this event, representatives of several countries under attack by the US will speak.

For more information and to endorse the actions: https://peoplesmobe.org/

The Rate of Exploitation is out of control

The chart below is a stark reminder of how wages and compensation have not kept pace with the productivity gains of the last 30 years:

And this chart shows a massive rise in income inequality, directly correlating to attacks on collective bargaining rights:

As EPI’s Heidi Shierholz writes: “Impeding union representation has been a primary goal of corporate interests in recent decades, and these interests have convinced conservative policymakers to attack collective bargaining through legislation, executive rulemaking, and the courts.” Indeed, the evidence is clear that President Trump and conservatives in Congress have expended no real effort in helping generate wage growth for most workers, but have done plenty that will make it harder for workers to see wage gains in the future. Here are just a few anti-worker policies Trump was able to push through a Republican-controlled Congress in 2017 and 2018: 1) Enacting tax cuts that overwhelmingly favor the wealthy over the average worker. 2) Taking billions out of workers’ pockets by weakening or abandoning regulations that protect their pay. 3) Blocking workers from access to the courts by allowing mandatory arbitration clauses in employment contracts. 4) Pushing immigration policies that hurt all workers. 5) Rolling back regulations that protect worker pay and safety.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Campaign Calls On the DNC to Ensure Transparency in Debate Requirements  

WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. The campaign of Congresswoman and presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard is calling on the Democratic National Committee to revise their list of debate qualifying polls in light of numerous irregularities in the selection and timing of those polls, to ensure transparency and fairness.  The DNC set a threshold that candidates must meet 2% in four DNC-certified polls in order to qualify for the third and fourth Democratic primary debates. However, the DNC has not released their criteria for selecting the 16 polling organizations they deem “certified.”  Rep. Gabbard has exceeded 2% support in 26 national and early state polls, but only two of them are on the DNC’s “certified” list. Many of the uncertified polls, including those conducted by highly reputable organizations such as The Economist and the Boston Globe, are ranked by Real Clear Politics and FiveThirtyEight as more accurate than some DNC “certified” polls.  After examining the list of certified and non-certified polls, Michael Tracey wrote in Real Clear Politics, “Tulsi Gabbard is on the verge of being excluded from the next Democratic presidential debate on the basis of criteria that appear increasingly absurd.”    The Democratic National Committee has the responsibility to facilitate more conversations between the future leaders of this country, not less. Notably, there have been only four qualifying polls released after the second Democratic primary debate compared with fourteen qualifying polls released in the month after the first Democratic primary debate.  Having received 2% in a qualifying CNN poll released Tuesday, August 20th, Gabbard is now two DNC-certified polls away from qualifying for the debates in Houston next month. According to Tracey, “Gabbard has [also] polled at 2% or more in two polls sponsored by the two largest newspapers in two early primary states, but the DNC -- through its mysteriously incoherent selection process -- has determined that these surveys do not count toward her debate eligibility. Without these exclusions, Gabbard would have already qualified.”  In a 2018 memo laying out their proposed framework for the debates, the DNC wrote, “Given the fluid nature of the presidential nominating process, the DNC will continuously assess the state of the race and make adjustments to this process as appropriate.”  The Gabbard campaign is calling on the DNC to hold true to their promise and make adjustments to the process now to ensure transparency and fairness. Crucial decisions on debate qualifications that impact the right of the American people to have the opportunity to participate fully in the Democratic process should not be made in secret by party bosses. For the sake of democracy, those decisions must be made openly, with clear and consistent standards and a sufficient window of opportunity for candidates to demonstrate genuine grassroots momentum and enthusiasm.  Additional Background Timing of polls released after the first and second Democratic primary debates  As the campaigns head into the second half of August, only four of the DNC’s list of sixteen qualifying polling organizations - Monmouth, Fox, Quinnipiac and CNN/SRSS - have released any new polls following the second July 30-31 Democratic presidential debate in Detroit.  In the two weeks after the first Democratic primary debate in Miami, the period between June 28 and July 13, six DNC-certified polls were released. After the second debate in Detroit, when Rep. Gabbard had one of the strongest performances on the stage, only two certified polls were released in the two weeks following her break-out appearance.

No major news source released a national poll in the two week period following the second debate, compared to five polls released by seven major news organizations after the first debate. For example, CNN released DNC-certified polls on a regular monthly basis since March until after the Detroit debate (which CNN co-hosted) when they inexplicably stopped releasing polls. Following the first debate in Miami, 14 of the DNC’s qualified polling organizations released numbers, and four of these organizations releasedmultiple polls. This contrasts starkly with the almost dormant activity of these same polling organizations following the second debate.  The delayed release of polls so long after the debates is particularly harmful to candidates with lower name-recognition. Delayed poll releases are an advantage for high-name recognition candidates such as Vice President Joe Biden and Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris. DNC’s polling criteria is unknown; disadvantages Rep. Gabbard In addition, the campaign is concerned that the DNC has not made their criteria for poll selection known and, in some cases, the DNC is relying on inferior, less accurate polls.  As of Aug 20th, Rep. Gabbard has qualified for two DNC-certified polls, but she has exceeded 2% support in 24 uncertified non-qualifying polls since June 28 (as reported by Real Clear Politics and FiveThirtyEight).  Rep. Gabbard’s qualifying/non-qualifying polls above 2% since June 28th DNC-Qualifying Polls Over 2% Since June 28th New Hampshire (CBS/YouGov) 2% (July 2019) National (CNN/SSRS) 2% (July 2019) Non Qualifying Polls 2% and Over Since June 28th (national and early states only) (Currently 24) National (Harvard/Harris) 2% (July 2019) National (Emerson) 2% (July 2019) National (Economist/YouGov) 2% (July 2019) New Hampshire (Change Research/PollerCoaster) 2% (July 2019) South Carolina (Change Research/PollerCoaster) 2% (July 2019) New Hampshire (603/Change Research) 3% (July 2019) National (ABC News/Washington Post) (July 2019) (*qualifying poll but “non-qualifying” question. received 2% in open-ended question) National (The Economist/YouGov) 2% (July 24th 2019) National (YouGov/PerryUdem) 2% (July 29th) National (ChangeResearch) 2% (July 29th 2019) National (Echelon Insights) 2% (July 29th 2019) National (The Economist/YouGov) 2% (July 31st 2019) National (HarrisX) 3% (August 2nd 2019) National (HarrisX) 2% (July 30th 2019) National (HarrisX) 2% (July 31st 2019) New Hampshire (Suffolk University/Boston Globe) 3% (August 6th 2019) National (The Economist/YouGov) 3% (August 7th 2019) National (ChangeResearch) 2% (August 8th 2019) New Hampshire (Gravis Marketing) 5% (August 13th 2019) National (YouGov/The Economist) 2% (August 14th 2019) Iowa (ChangeResearch) 2% (August 15th, 2019) South Carolina (ChangeResearch) 2% (August 15, 2019) Nevada (Gravis Marketing) 2% (August 20th 2019) National (The Economist/YouGov) 2% (August 21st 2019) While conventional wisdom might assume DNC-certified polls are more accurate than non-qualifying polls, this is not always true. Many non-qualifying polls are more accurate than the DNC’s preferred polls (Sources: American Research Group and FiveThirtyEight). For example, Rep. Gabbard had 3% support Suffolk and Emerson polls (both rated B+). These polls are not approved by the DNC, but received higher accuracy ratings on FiveThirtyEight than some other DNC-approved polls, such as NPR (rated B-). In addition, Rep. Gabbard met the 2% threshold in the Politico/Morning Consult poll, which is non-qualifying and is rated the same as the DNC-“certified” NPR poll. The DNC also “certifies” a poll taken by SurveyMonkey, which received a “D-” accuracy rating, just because the pollster was commissioned by NBC, which is a DNC-approved sponsor. We are calling on the DNC to certify the Boston Globe/Suffolk University poll and the Economist/YouGov polls, which show that Congresswoman Gabbard increased her support to 3%, as well as the Post and Courier poll, conducted by the highest-circulation newspaper in South Carolina. There is no justifiable reason for the DNC to exclude these polls, or polls from other credible organizations.   Journalists with questions should reach out to press@tulsi2020.com and cullen@tulsi2020.com.    Additional background and commentary from Michael Tracey https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/08/21/gabbard_victimized_by_dncs_dubious_debate_criteria_141055.html Tulsi Gabbard is on the verge of being excluded from the next Democratic presidential debate on the basis of criteria that appear increasingly absurd. 1. Take, for instance, her poll standing in New Hampshire, which currently places Gabbard at 3.3% support, according to the RealClearPolitics average as of Aug. 20. One might suspect that such a figure would merit inclusion in the upcoming debates -- especially considering she’s ahead of several candidates who have already been granted entry, including Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, Beto O’Rourke, and Andrew Yang. 2. But a poll sponsored by the newspaper with the largest circulation in New Hampshire (the Globe recently surpassed the New Hampshire Union Leader there) does not count, per this cockamamie criteria. 3. A South Carolina poll published Aug. 14 by the Post and Courier placed Gabbard at 2%. One might have again vainly assumed that the newspaper with the largest circulation in a critical early primary state would be an “approved” sponsor per the dictates of the DNC, but it is not. Curious. 4. But Gabbard has polled at 2% or more in six additional YouGov polls -- except those polls are sponsored by The Economist, not CBS. Needless to say, The Economist is not a “sponsoring organization,” per the whims of the DNC. It may be one of the most vaunted news organizations in the world, and YouGov may be a “qualified” polling firm in other contexts, but the DNC has chosen to exclude The Economist’s results for reasons that appear less and less defensible.

About Tulsi Gabbard:   Tulsi is the first female combat veteran to ever run for U.S. president and, along with Tammy Duckworth, one of the first two female combat veterans elected to Congress. Currently a major in the Army National Guard, she has been serving as a Soldier for over 16 years and deployed twice to the Middle East.   Tulsi is a Democrat and was first elected to Congress in 2012. She has been serving there for more than 6 years, including on the Homeland Security, Foreign Affairs, and Armed Services Committees.   Tulsi was Vice Chair of the Democratic National Committee from 2013 until she resigned in 2016 to endorse Bernie Sanders in his bid for President.   Tulsi’s campaign for president is powered completely by people. She does not accept campaign contributions from corporations, lobbyists, or any political action committees.   Tulsi was born a US citizen on April 12, 1981 in American Samoa. When she was two years old, her family moved to Hawaii, where she grew up. As is typical of many residents of Hawaii, she is of mixed ethnicity, including Asian, Polynesian, and Caucasian descent.